Defense Rests in Daniel Prude Case: Client Declines Stand in Subway Chokehold Death

ROCHESTER, N.Y. – The defense in the Daniel Prude case has rested without calling its client to the witness stand. Prude, a 41-year-old Black man, died in March 2020 after Rochester police officers restrained him and placed a “spit hood” over his head. His death sparked protests and a nationwide outcry over police brutality.

Charges and Defense Strategy

The officers involved in Prude’s death are charged with second-degree murder and other felonies. The defense has argued that the officers used reasonable force and that Prude’s death was caused by an accidental overdose of drugs.

Expert Testimony

During the trial, the prosecution presented testimony from medical experts who testified that Prude died as a result of asphyxiation. The defense, however, called its own experts who argued that Prude’s health conditions, including PCP use, contributed to his death.

Public Reaction

The Prude case has drawn national attention and fueled ongoing discussions about police accountability and the treatment of people with mental illness. Many in the community expressed outrage over Prude’s death and demanded justice.

Next Steps

With the defense resting, the jury is now expected to begin deliberating. The verdict could have significant implications for future cases involving police use of force and the rights of individuals with mental illness.

Conclusion

The Daniel Prude case is a complex and emotionally charged trial. The outcome will send a message about the boundaries of police power and the consequences of excessive force. As the jury deliberates, the nation will be watching closely for the verdict that could shape the future of police-community relations.