
In a 9-0 decision, the court ruled that Paxton has “absolute immunity” from testifying in a civil lawsuit related to his official duties. The decision protects Paxton from being questioned under oath about his role in the alleged misconduct.
The lawsuit, filed by eight former and current employees of the Attorney General’s office, accuses Paxton of using state funds to promote his own political agenda and of retaliating against employees who spoke out against him.
Paxton has denied the allegations and defended his actions as within his authority as Attorney General.
“This ruling is a victory for the rule of law and the separation of powers,” said Paxton in a statement. “As Attorney General, I am immune from civil lawsuits related to my official duties.”
The plaintiffs’ attorney, David Rogers, expressed disappointment with the ruling. “We believe the Attorney General has abused his authority and should be held accountable,” he said. “This decision sets a dangerous precedent.”
The decision is a significant setback for the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. It remains to be seen whether they will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The case has drawn national attention and has become a political issue in Texas. Paxton, a Republican, has been a controversial figure since taking office in 2015. He has faced criminal charges of securities fraud, which are still pending, and has been sued numerous times over his conduct as Attorney General.
The Texas Supreme Court’s ruling is likely to have a broader impact on the ability of government officials to be held accountable for actions taken in their official capacity.
/https://static.texastribune.org/media/files/6bc3f417bb061f62dc9e894d03bf53a0/Ken_Paxton.jpg)